主页 › The Life of the Mind › Thinking › Introduction III · Appearance I · pp. 19–23
Appearance I
1 · The world’s phenomenal nature
Hannah Arendt, The Life of the Mind · Volume One: Thinking · printed pp. 19–23
Does God ever judge us by appearances? I suspect that he does.W. H. Auden
128The world men are born into contains many things, natural and artificial, living and dead, transient and sempiternal, all of which have in common that they appear and hence are meant to be seen, heard, touched, tasted, and smelled, to be perceived by sentient creatures endowed with the appropriate sense organs.
129Nothing could appear, the word “appearance” would make no sense, if recipients of appearances did not exist—living creatures able to acknowledge, recognize, and react to—in flight or desire, approval or disapproval, blame or praise—what is not merely there but appears to them and is meant for their perception.
把插入修饰压缩后读:In this world, Being and Appearing coincide.
直译需要时再展开
在这个我们进入的世界中——我们从一个无处显现而来,又从这里消失到一个无处——存在与显现重合。
131Dead matter, natural and artificial, changing and unchanging, depends in its being, that is, in its appearingness, on the presence of living creatures.
短句要停顿读出它的纲领性:Plurality / is the law / of the earth.
直译需要时再展开
复数性是大地的法则。
136Since sentient beings—men and animals, to whom things appear and who as recipients guarantee their reality—are themselves also appearances, meant and able both to see and be seen, hear and be heard, touch and be touched, they are never mere subjects and can never be understood as such; they are no less “objective” than stone and bridge.
137The worldliness of living things means that there is no subject that is not also an object and appears as such to somebody else, who guarantees its “objective” reality.
138What we usually call “consciousness,” the fact that I am aware of myself and therefore in a sense can appear to myself, would never suffice to guarantee reality.
139(Descartes’ Cogito me cogitare ergo sum is a non sequitur for the simple reason that this res cogitans never appears at all unless its cogitationes are made manifest in sounding-out or written-down speech, which is already meant for and presupposes auditors and readers as its recipients.)
典故Descartes’ formula — 阿伦特故意写成 Cogito me cogitare ergo sum(“我思我在思,故我在”),把问题集中到思考者能否仅凭内在思考保证自己作为世界存在者的现实。
140Seen from the perspective of the world, every creature born into it arrives well equipped to deal with a world in which Being and Appearing coincide; they are fit for worldly existence.
141Living beings, men and animals, are not just in the world, they are of the world, and this precisely because they are subjects and objects—perceiving and being perceived—at the same time.
142Nothing perhaps is more surprising in this world of ours than the almost infinite diversity of its appearances, the sheer entertainment value of its views, sounds, and smells, something that is hardly ever mentioned by the thinkers and philosophers.
143(Only Aristotle at least incidentally counted the life of passive enjoyment of the pleasures our bodily organs provide as among the three ways of life that can be elected by those who, not being subject to necessity, can devote themselves to the kalon, to what is beautiful in opposition to what is necessary and useful.¹)
注Aristotle’s three ways of life — 脚注所指是《尼各马可伦理学》I.5;三种生活通常概括为享乐生活、政治生活与沉思生活。阿伦特注意的是:感官愉悦至少曾被承认为自由生活的一种。
144This diversity is matched by an equally astounding diverseness of sense organs among the animal species, so that what actually appears to living creatures assumes the greatest variety of form and shape: every animal species lives in a world of its own.
145Still, all sense-endowed creatures have appearance as such in common, first, an appearing world and second, and perhaps even more important, the fact that they themselves are appearing and disappearing creatures, that there always was a world before their arrival and there always will be a world after their departure.
一句对称句:world before arrival / world after departure。
直译需要时再展开
活着,意味着生活在一个先于自己的到来而存在、并将在自己的离去之后继续存在的世界中。
147On this level of sheer being alive, appearance and disappearance, as they follow upon each other, are the primordial events, which as such mark out time, the time span between birth and death.
148The finite life span allotted to each living creature determines not merely its life expectancy but also its time experience; it provides the secret prototype for all time measurements no matter how far these then may transcend the allotted life span into past and future.
重音放在 lived:the LIVED length changes, not the calendar year。
直译需要时再展开
因此,对于一年之长度的切身经验,在我们一生之中会发生根本变化。
150A year that to a five-year-old constitutes a full fifth of his existence must seem much longer than when it will constitute a mere twentieth or thirtieth of his time on earth.
151We all know how the years revolve quicker and quicker as we get older, until, with the approach of old age, they slow down again because we begin to measure them against the psychologically and somatically anticipated date of our departure.
153This is the time of the world, and its underlying assumption—regardless of any religious or scientific beliefs—is that the world has neither beginning nor end, an assumption that seems only natural for beings who always come into a world that preceded them and will survive them.
according to = “随着/依据”;standpoint 是站位,perspective 是由站位形成的透视。
显得如何取决于观看视角。
一句关系公式:to appear = to seem to others; seeming varies with perspective。
直译需要时再展开
显现总意味着向他者显得如此,而这种显得如何,会依观看者的立场和透视而变化。
160In other words, every appearing thing acquires, by virtue of its appearingness, a kind of disguise that may indeed—but does not have to—hide or disfigure it.
听主动与被动的回声:respond by SHOWING to the effect of BEING SHOWN。
直译需要时再展开
趋向自我展示的冲动——以展示来回应被展示这一事实的压倒性作用——似乎为人和动物所共有。
163And just as the actor depends upon stage, fellow-actors, and spectators, to make his entrance, every living thing depends upon a world that solidly appears as the location for its own appearance, on fellow-creatures to play with, and on spectators to acknowledge and recognize its existence.
164Seen from the viewpoint of the spectators to whom it appears and from whose view it finally disappears, each individual life, its growth and decline, is a developmental process in which an entity unfolds itself in an upward movement until all its properties are fully exposed; this phase is followed by a period of standstill—its bloom or epiphany, as it were—which in turn is succeeded by the downward movement of disintegration that is terminated by complete disappearance.
165There are many perspectives in which this process can be seen, examined, and understood, but our criterion for what a living thing essentially is remains the same: in everyday life as well as in scientific study, it is determined by the relatively short time span of its full appearance, its epiphany.
166The choice, guided by the sole criteria of completeness and perfection in appearance, would be entirely arbitrary if reality were not first of all of a phenomenal nature.
条件逻辑:not arbitrary only because reality is phenomenal first of all。
直译需要时再展开
这个由显现中的完整性与完善性这唯一标准所引导的选择,如果现实首先不是现象性的,就会完全是任意的。
167The primacy of appearance for all living creatures to whom the world appears in the mode of an it-seems-to-me is of great relevance to the topic we are going to deal with—those mental activities by which we distinguish ourselves from other animal species.
168For although there are great differences among these activities, they all have in common a withdrawal from the world as it appears and a bending back toward the self.
169This would cause no great problem if we were mere spectators, godlike creatures thrown into the world to look after it or enjoy it and be entertained by it, but still in possession of some other region as our natural habitat.
170However, we are of the world and not merely in it; we, too, are appearances by virtue of arriving and departing, of appearing and disappearing; and while we come from a nowhere, we arrive well equipped to deal with whatever appears to us and to take part in the play of the world.
171These properties do not vanish when we happen to be engaged in mental activities and close the eyes of our body, to use the Platonic metaphor, in order to be able to open the eyes of the mind.
典故The eyes of the mind — 柏拉图传统把感官之眼与心灵之眼对立:哲学思考闭上对可见物的注意,以转向不可见的真理。阿伦特接受“退离”的经验,却拒绝由此推出我们属于另一个世界。
172The two-world theory belongs among the metaphysical fallacies but it would never have been able to survive for so many centuries if it had not so plausibly corresponded to some basic experiences.
173As Merleau-Ponty once put it, “I can flee being only into being,”² and since Being and Appearing coincide for men, this means that I can flee appearance only into appearance.
174And that does not solve the problem, for the problem concerns the fitness of thought to appear at all, and the question is whether thinking and other invisible and soundless mental activities are meant to appear or whether in fact they can never find an adequate home in the world.